Assassination for military purposes, falling as the military does into the jurisdiction of an Imperial governor, has long been espoused, forming a standard part of Imperial military doctrine and. A group or an organisation might be based upon and around a particularly strong, canny or charismatic leader, whose loss could paralyze the ability of both to make war or threaten Imperial rule. However, in modern warfare a soldier's mindset is generally considered to surround ideals far more than specific leaders, while command structures are more flexible in replacing officer losses. While the death of a popular or successful leader often has a detrimental effect on morale, the organisational system and the belief in a specific cause is usually strong enough to enable continued warfare.
There is also the risk that the target could be replaced by an even more competent leader or that such a killing (or a failed attempt) will "martyr" a leader and support his cause (by showing the moral ruthlessness of the assassins). Faced with particularly brilliant leaders, this possibility has in various instances been risked.
There are a number of additional examples from the Galactic Civil War, the last major total war, which show how assassination was used as a military tool at both tactical and strategic levels:
Therefore even in military operations, just as in civil, careful consideration of the effect of an assassination must be made and assessed on a tactical and strategic level, and the possibility of failure and its consequences always borne in mind - the price a Governor has to pay for the availability of assassination within his arsenal.